Swiss voters have shown their pragmatism in rejecting a proposal to cap the salaries of top executives at 12 times that of a company’s lowest wage, according to newspapers on Monday.
Although the public continues to shake a fist at massive executive pay, the idea of a fixed upper wage limit was seen as too extreme by many voters – 65.3% of whom on Sunday said no to the initiative by the youth wing of the centre-left Social Democratic Party.
For Der Bund in Bern, the fear of economic damage was stronger than the desire for justice. «Anger over wage orgies in boardrooms has not dissipated. Only if the majority of voters feel that the business world is not abusing its freedom will they be prepared to reject leftwing regulation and rightwing isolationism.»
The Neue Luzerner Zeitung believed that unlike the so-called fat cat initiative – backed by 68% of voters in March and which gives shareholders a veto over top manager payments – «the business world this time managed to get its arguments across».
«Despite its defeat, the leftwing will continue its march against the liberal economic system,» it continued. «The parties on the other side can merely breathe a sigh of relief for the time being.»
Popular displeasure
The Berner Zeitung said that although popular displeasure remained high over occasionally «astronomical» salaries – at one point Credit Suisse Chief Executive Brady Dougan’s total pay was 1,182 times that of the bank’s lowest paid employee, according to union federation TravailSuisse – getting Swiss voters to pass a fixed wage cap was almost impossible.
«Nevertheless, companies have been warned to do away with telephone number salaries because understanding for such behaviour hasn’t grown following the vote.»
As the Tages-Anzeiger pointed out, «every third voter in this relatively liberal country wanted a wage cap to be fixed by the state. The initiative’s opponents can’t simply blow off demands for a fairer distribution of wages».
The Swiss voting system is not totally immune to populism, according to the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, but it generally stays pragmatic and forgoes any experiments. Sunday’s result «has shown up the limit of the initiative’s organisers’ policy and campaigning», it concluded.
‘Own goal’
In the French-speaking part of Switzerland, 24 Heures in Lausanne and La Tribune de Genève both reckoned the Social Democrats had scored an own goal, with Sunday’s result leaving the left and the unions in a bad position.
«The comfortable victory for the right gives them a huge advantage for the much more important campaign of a minimum wage: that of credibility,» they said.
While La Liberté in Fribourg agreed that the size of the victory «would give a boost to opponents of the union initiative», Le Quotidien Jurassien wasn’t sure that Sunday’s result necessarily meant a rejection of a minimum wage.
It pointed out that Germany was going to introduce a minimum wage and this would have an effect on Switzerland.
In Geneva, Le Temps viewed the rejection from another perspective. Admitting that the «severity of the economic competition alarms large swathes of the population», it pointed out that «closing the borders seems to many people a simple solution, as efficient as the salary cap initiative».
As a result, «another battle begins: combatting the Swiss People’s Party’s initiative on mass immigration». Voters will have their say on that on February 9.